A Simple Proof of Parsons' Theorem

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Simple Proof of Parsons' Theorem

Let IΣ1 be the fragment of elementary Peano Arithmetic in which induction is restricted to Σ1-formulas. More than three decades ago, Charles Parsons showed that the provably total functions of IΣ1 are exactly the primitive recursive functions. In this paper, we observe that Parsons’ result is a consequence of Herbrand’s theorem concerning the ∃∀∃-consequences of universal theories. We give a se...

متن کامل

A simple proof of Zariski's Lemma

‎Our aim in this very short note is to show that the proof of the‎ ‎following well-known fundamental lemma of Zariski follows from an‎ ‎argument similar to the proof of the fact that the rational field‎ ‎$mathbb{Q}$ is not a finitely generated $mathbb{Z}$-algebra.

متن کامل

Simple proof of Chebotarëv’s theorem

We give a simple proof of Chebotarëv’s theorem: Let p be a prime and ω a primitive pth root of unity. Then all minors of the matrix ( ω ij )p−1 i,j=0 are non-zero. Let p be a prime and ω a primitive pth root of unity. We write Fp for the field with p elements. In 1926, Chebotarëv proved the following theorem (see [3]): Theorem. For any sets I, J ⊆ Fp with equal cardinality, the matrix (ω )i∈I,j...

متن کامل

A Simple Proof of Sharkovsky's Theorem Revisited

Sharkovsky’s theorem [1], [5], [6] claims its place among the gems of dynamical systems mainly because of its simple hypotheses and strong conclusion. Loosely speaking, it states that, if f is a continuous map from a compact interval I into itself that has a period-m point, then f also has a period-n point whenever m ≺ n in the Sharkovsky’s ordering ≺ of the natural numbers but may not have a p...

متن کامل

A simple proof of Sharkovsky’s theorem rerevisited

In proving the celebrated Sharkovsky cycle coexistence theorem, the standard arguments [1, 2] (see also [4, 10, 14]) reduce the proof to considering only the case where the continuous map has periodic orbits of odd periods ≥ 3 (MR591173(82j:58097)) and then prove that some such periodic orbits have the structures of the so-called Štefan cycles and draw the desired conclusions from the directed ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

سال: 2005

ISSN: 0029-4527

DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1107220675